OUR MISSION

  • Educate the public about the significance and advantages of proportional representation for women in all areas of civic life.
  • Examine what misogyny is, particularly with regard to how it differs from yet overlaps with sexism toward women.
  • Explain what we can do to prevent misogyny from keeping women from proportional representation in every sector of public life.

Latest JEvents

No events
Home

JEvents Legend

Calendar legend should not be displayed here!!!

What's Up

  • For Women's History Month, we are rolling out downloadable fliers about just a few women who worked their way over, around, and through whatever misogyny the world threw at them and by doing so put women - and men - forward. The first two are ready - check them out by clicking "Spread the Word" under the main menu or the "Spread the Word" button to the left.
  • Also for Women's History Month, we are featuring women of interest on our founder's blog, Heidi Li on Equality. We are also adding information about women and their accomplishments to our reference shelf. For expample, read about Barbara Liskov, recently named winner of the Turing Medal, the highest prize in computer science.
  • Via the generous financial support of a donor, we now have 51 Percent lapel pins - and for every $10.51 donated between now and March 30 we will send you a lapel pin (if you donate $21.02, for example, we'll send two), to help spread the word about 51 Percent. Offer good while supplies last. Below and left you can see a well-known person modeling the 1 inch pin. Donate to 51 Percent by hitting the support button to the right or just go here.  You can donate by mail by sending a check to 51 Percent, 2118 Bancroft Place NW, Washington DC 20008.  As of March 9, we have approximately only 30 pins left.
 
51 Percent - Put Women Forward
Women in India Form Their Own Political Party PDF Print E-mail
Women in India Form Their Own Political Party
Run Date: 01/07/08
By Aditi Bhaduri
WeNews correspondent

The first all-women's political party in India has formed after 100 women joined. A first order of business is to boost female representation in parliament from 8 to 50 percent. Seventh in a series on the changing role of women in India.

Suman Krishan Kant

DELHI, India (WOMENSENEWS)--It is a mellow December morning in Delhi. Soft sunlight filters through the trees that line the boulevards of the city's stately Krishna Menon Marg neighborhood.

Suman Krishan Kant, however, is oblivious to the tranquillity outside the windows of her well-appointed bungalow.

The prominent social activist is reviewing and paying bills while files wait on the table for her attention. The elegant waiting room outside is beginning to fill in with men and women hoping to meet with her and enlist her advocacy with government agencies on their behalf. One of them, for instance, is a widow who hopes Kant will help her application for an increase in her pension.

It is the beginning of another working day for the president of the country's all-women's political party.

In October, Kant, the widow of former vice president Krishan Kumar Kant, joined with other influential women to launch the United Women's Front to address issues such as women's illiteracy, early marriage and tokenism in parliament, where women hold just 8 percent of seats. To qualify for official party status, the group had to muster at least 100 members and pay about $300 in registration fees.

"Women have simply not been getting the kind of governance they deserve," says Kant. "Take Delhi for example. It has a female chief minister, yet it is one of the most dangerous places for women . . . All this is precisely because we do not have enough women in decision-making and in the political process. A few women here and there cannot make much of a difference."

Prem Ahluwalia is a journalist who specializes in women's issues and directs the Dehli-based Institute for South Asian Women, which seeks to foster ties among women in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and the Maldives. She is also the United Women Front's national general secretary.

"It is for the first time in the history of India that a national political party has been formed by women," she says. "In fact it is the only party of women in the world. We need to ensure that the issues of priority concern to half of its population remain in the forefront of the pressing issues on India's national agenda."
Land of Contradictions

India is often called a land of contradictions and that pertains to the status of women here. The national constitution guaranteed women's legal equality in 1950. India also elected Indira Ghandi in 1966, making her the world's second female prime minister after Sri Lanka's Sirimavo Bandarnaike, who took office in 1960.

This past July Pratibha Patil was elected the country's first female president, a mostly ceremonial position that nonetheless leaves India with a female head of state.

Women hold top cabinets posts and at least three states have female chief ministers. Village councils reserve 33 percent of their seats for women.

On the other hand, millions of women live in poverty, illiteracy, malnourishment and ill-health. In November, the World Economic Forum's latest gender gap index put India among the world's 10 most gender-biased economies, with women's participation in the paid work force at 36 percent.

Recently, Sonia Gandhi, the female president of the All India Congress Party, the ruling party in the coalition government, said she was unable to pass a bill first introduced in 1996 that ensures 33 percent of parliamentary seats--the widely assumed critical mass--go to women.

The Ministry of Women and Child Development in 2006 drafted a bill for the prevention of workplace sexual harassment that was supposed to have been passed this year. However, it is still pending.
New Law Lacks Implementation

National statistics from 2005 to 2006 show 40 percent of Indian women suffer from domestic abuse. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act passed through parliament in 2005 and came into force last year.

Lawyers, however, widely lament that insufficient arrangements have been made for them to handle cases brought under the law. For instance, the trained personnel--counselors, protection officers, service providers--called for by the law are not in place.

The party has these types of issues in its sights. In the two months since its formation, however, it has focused on recruitment and making 50 percent female representation in parliament its chief objective.

So far the party has established organizations in 16 of India's 28 states. The groups vary in size. The Delhi chapter, for instance, claims 25,000 members; another state chapter claims 5,000.

The chapters are mainly led by veteran activists. The state of Orissa, for instance, has Shanti Das, a well-known union activist; Punjab has Pam Rajput, a prominent women's rights activist and scholar.
Men Join In

But that doesn't mean the party excludes men.

As Women's eNews visits Kant's office, in fact, Mohamed Shafique, 24, walks in, pulls out a file from the cupboard and starts leafing through it. He is preparing to begin the day as one of the party's workers in Delhi, which holds state-level elections in July 2008, the first test of the new party's ability to make a mark.

United Women Front is planning to field candidates for all 72 of Delhi's assembly seats. So far it is stressing education and safety for women and an end to all kinds of violence against women.

"We need the youth," says Kant, referring to Shafique, "because India has a young population." According to official statistics here, 50 percent of India's population of 1.1 billion in 2006 was under 25.

"We are not against men," Kant says. "We need men to work with us and we need their support."

However, she draws certain lines.

"Men will not be part of the national committee," says Kant firmly. "Men will be members of state chapters only; but we will have only women at the national level."

Aditi Bhaduri is a gender consultant and a journalist based in India.
 
A memoir of devotion to appropriate representation of women PDF Print E-mail
[Note from 51 Percent:  this memoir-like essay resulted from correspondence regarding the good work of the National Women's History Museum; text used by permission of the author]

I would be extremely pleased to have my name used with anything in connection with the National Women's History Museum.  I began receiving their mail many years ago and try to give a little donation every year to help make the museum become a reality.  Since I am no longer working, it isn't much but if everyone donates, it will make a tremendous difference.
 
I have been a strong supporter of women's rights as long as I can remember, although I grew up on a farm and went to a rural school in Kentucky where I learned nothing about women's history.  My family (including ten children) didn't own a television until I was age 15.  Sometime around age 35 I was lucky enough to discover Betty Friedan's "Feminine Mystique" and that was all I needed to send me on a quest for knowledge about women's rights, including reading women's history.  As a result, I decided to finish my college degree and go to law school and try to help change the horrid conditions for women and girls.  I arrived at law school at the age of 39.
 
I joined the National Organization for Women in 1973 and have maintained a membership until this year when my displeasure with the organization's leadership endorsing a man for President of the United States caused me to fail to renew.  I am very discouraged at the lack of leadership on women's issues.  As you know, we have made only 'baby steps' at reaching parity with males in our country.  I am turning 70 in April thus, I have had many years to join others to lobby and picket but I find it discouraging that there is so little progress.
 
I attended women's studies classes at Wichita State University in Kansas from 1976-1979.  It was only the second university in the nation to open a WS department.  I went on from Wichita State to the University of Kansas Law School, graduating in 1982 and practiced law in Wichita until 1995.
 
Family events led to me coming to Nashville in 2001.  In the meantime, I lived in Falls Church, VA and worked in the Gore 2000 campaign.  I was with the DNC team that went to Florida to count votes in December 2000 and as a result, I became a passionate advocate for voting integrity.
 
From my concerns about the theft of Al Gore's election in Florida in 2000 (and John Kerry's stolen election in 2004), I joined Common Cause of Tennessee in 2004 and was involved for four years with a dozen other committed citizen lobbyists who succeeded in (early 2008) passing a bill to assure paper ballots in our state.
 
My passion is working to educate all people about women's history.  On August 26th each year I am usually involved somewhere in a public event to help keep the "herstory" alive.  Since Tennessee was the 36th and last state needed to ratify the 19th Amendment, we do get some good "p.r." here in Nashville.  I often give as a gift, copies of "The Perfect 36" by Yellin & Sherman (ISBN: 0-916078-48-5) which was published in Oakridge, TN on the 75th anniversary of the 19th amendment.   As an elected Hillary Clinton delegate from Tennessee's 5th Congressional District, I celebrated on August 26, 2008 in Denver with Hillary and others from WomenCount.
 
In my retirement, I helped found a P.A.C. to raise money to elect pro-choice women to local and state offices in Tennessee and we are still struggling to continue.  We continue to be a very backward state and are even losing ground!  We do have the Tennessee Economic Council on Women and they are the only 'hope' for Tennessee women and girls.
 
I remain broken-hearted about the manner in which the Democratic Party broke their rules and went outside all bounds of ethical and legal behavior to deny Hillary the party's nomination for President.  I am a proud member of the HRC 300 club (the delegates who signed the petititon to assure Hillary's name was placed in nomination.)
 
Please carry on the important work that Elizabeth Cady Stanton & Susan B. Anthony started.  We are a long way from the finish line to reach equality in America and I am getting old and tired from the long fight.  We need young people to keep working to end the misogyny and make equality a reality in the United States!
 
Homophobia 101 - Second Invited Guest Essay PDF Print E-mail
Homophobia 101; and some connections between homophobia and misogyny
by Gary Rosche*
Second Invited Guest Essay
I have been thinking a lot about homophobia lately.  Mostly due to the whitewashing of it that we've seen in the aftermath of the passage of Prop 8 in California.  Gay people were told, by other gay people no less, that they were crossing a line by daring to say that black homophobia was a central cause of the law's passage.  We were told by our own brothers and sisters that our "white privilege" erased any damage that rampant homophobia in our society could possibly cause us, and that we should be ashamed of ourselves for comparing our situation to that of the civil rights struggle of African Americans.  We were told that attitudes are changing, especially among the youth, and that all we had to do is wait just a little bit longer and everything would be OK.  We were told that it is in our best interest to make nice with bigots who hate us, like Rick Warren, in the name of unity.  We were told that our civil rights would have to wait because the economy is in such dire straits.  We were told, basically, that our rights were not of primary importance.
Bullshit.
There is nothing more important in an open and free democracy than the equality of its people and that justice prevail for all citizens.  ...With liberty and justice for all.  We memorize that almost as soon as we learn to read.  So why are so many people willing to overlook that fact when it is denied to gay people?
Homophobia.
That's it.  It's not that difficult to understand.  It is the reason that gays are the only group left in this country for whom everyday derision and scorn is not only acceptable, it is encouraged by left and right alike.  Even sexism, which is probably the mother of homophobia, is universally denounced, if only in words. Even though sexism is rampant and acceptable in our society, at the very least in name, almost nobody tries to justify sexism qua sexism. At least in most polite secular public discourse, there is nobody arguing explicitly against the idea of women as full persons who should be considered possessed of equal rights, status, and opportunity; women's rights are not called "special rights".  Certainly in action this rhetoric is often flouted by those who espouse it. My point is that open homophobia is widely acceptable in our culture, institutionalized in any number of contexts and in many instances codified in law.  But rather than make a distinction between misogyny and homophobia, I wanted to point out that homophobia, and its societal expression, is an extension of misogyny and its social expression. Indeed homophobia might well be understood as a more "acceptable" outlet for misognyy in a society that pays lip service to women's equality. Homophobia might be the release that misogynists need to express their hatred of women--but more on that later.
Note:  Before anyone mentions my focus primarily on gay men in this post, I will point out that persecution of lesbians is not only as rampant as persecution of gay men, it is in many ways worse.  They are not only the object of hatred of women, but they are often depicted as the worst of the many failings of women.  Failure to be able to please a man, failure to conform to gender roles, failure to basically perpetuate the patriarchal status quo.  Men have been interchanging the words "feminist" and "lesbian" since the former first entered the lexicon.  Therefore, as I try to paint a picture of homophobia (in particular gay male homophobia) as a subset of misogyny, keep in mind that lesbians are subjected to both, and the subject is most definitely worthy of the focus of its own separate consideration.
From the Bible Belt to Hollywood, from the schoolyard to the White House.  From Main Street to Madison Avenue.  There is not one sector of this country that is not tainted by homophobia.  And that includes the gay community itself.  And it most certainly applies to all those young voters out there who are so proud that they are the first generation of the new post-racial, post-gay, post-partisan Age of Obama.  Actually post-reality might be more to the point.
So what proof do I offer that homophobia is persistent, even in the youth of America?  Well let's begin with popular culture, which in our age obsessed society is almost entirely directed at those 18-35 year olds that advertisers love so much.  And homophobia sells.  Especially to young men.  Let's take a look.

As I mentioned before, homophobia in many ways is a subset of misogyny.   Being a sissy, or being too closely associated with anything that is traditionally feminine in our culture is seen as a weakness, not only because of its connection to homosexuality, but because in our patriarchal society, women are second class, and nothing could be more deviant or abhorrent than a male being perceived to act like a woman--a member of the servile class.  All you have to do is open a magazine to realize this.  Take this ad from Nike:

In this ad, the connection between homophobia and misogyny is clear. Do not doubt that the readers, especially the young male readers, get the message.  Ballet is for girls, and if you are a boy and you like ballet, that means you are acting like a girl. That makes you a fag. And being a fag is not only about sex (although that plays a part, which we will discuss later), it is about the unforgivable sin of emulating a woman. Barely legible in the bottom right corner it says "Raise a Champion".  It might as well just say "Don't Raise a Fag".  This is a persistent message in our culture.  The worst thing that can happen to a man is that he ends up gay.  Here's another example:
In case you can't read it, this is what the small print says:
"He didn't do pilates. Moisturize.  Or drink pink cocktails.  Your dad drank whiskey cocktails. Made with Canadian Club. Served in a rocks glass. They tasted good.  They were effortless.  DAMN RIGHT YOUR DAD DRANK IT."
I don't think the message could be any clearer.  They just cleverly substituted the word "fag" with "metrosexual".  And again, its not the sex part of being gay that is ridiculed, it's the supposedly "feminine" aspect. (this ad, btw, is from an entire series that is not only homophobic, but UNBELIEVABLY sexist)
But not only is homophobia about demonizing gays as "feminine".  It also has to do with the actual sex act itself.  These of course go hand in hand because the thing about gay sex that makes it taboo is that it is also seen as being feminine.  A man who allows himself to be penetrated, either orally or anally is putting himself on the same level as a woman sexually, and for this reason so many men seem to be repulsed or offended by the mere thought of it.  This fear makes its way onto the billboards and tv ads as well.  Again from Nike:
And this from the same series:
In case you weren't aware, "punk" is the equivalent to "fag" in many circles.  Of course the implication is that even in the heat of a sports match, a gay person is constantly going to try to penetrate you.  Ironically men are taught to both fear being raped by gay men while at the same time scorning them for acting like women.   We've heard these two disparate reasons even recently in the conversation about ending DADT.  Opponents argue that gays will not only disrupt cohesion by making straight men feel uncomfortable around girly gays, they will also feel threatened (supposedly by the fear of rape) by having to shower with them as well.
Finally, I found this short piece on youtube about homophobia in advertising. Watch here. What I especially appreciate is the attention drawn to the one two punch delivered to gays by these messages.  First, any ad which is pro gay is quickly neutralized and censored, while the ads that portray violence against gays or reinforce stereotypes are heralded as groundbreaking and hilarious.
These ads aren't aimed at right wing, older, religious nuts.  They are aimed at YOUNG MEN.  So don't tell me that homophobia is passe, or that I'm making a mountain out of a molehill.  Homophobia is widespread and entirely acceptable in our society.  It is an acceptable extension of misogyny; and more specifically violence and hatred directed at women.   Gay men are women by proxy and our society has given permission to straight men to act out otherwise taboo aggressions on them rather than direct them towards women.  Until we end misogyny in this country, it seems unlikely that we will make any inroads in terms of ending homophobia.  And the only way to deal with both is to stand up and shout that we aren't going to take it anymore.  Not from men. Not from women.  Not from the media. Not from Hollywood. Not from liberals. Not from conservatives. Not from blacks. Not from whites. Not from Christians. Not from Muslims. Not from Jews.  Not from Democrats. Not from Republicans. NOT FROM ANYONE.  It is time to end homophobia NOW.
SILENCE=DEATH
Gary Rosche is a gay blogger who lives and works in Chapel Hill, NC.  He blogs under the name garychapelhill along with his husband, Mawm, at his blog Electric Blues.

New layer...
 
Alison Des Forges PDF Print E-mail
Saturday, 14 February 2009 22:49
Information submitted by reader Chris V.
The untimely death of Alison des Forges reminded me of Rwanda. In honor of Alison's work, I want to refer you to Frontline's 2003 interview with her and this one with Prudence Bushnell who was deputy assistant secretary of state for African affairs at the time. Both interviews come under the title "Ghosts of Rwanda" and give readers good insight into the dynamics of policymaking especially as it involved the State department and the National Security Counsel.
I hope you will pass on information about the said interviews to your fellow-travelers (or fellow bloggers). Thank you.
 
Equal Rights Amendment activity in Missouri and Arkansas PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 06 February 2009 09:51

Missouri state senator Jolie Justus has introduced a bill to ratify of Equal Rights Amendment in Missouri. For further information, you can contact Senator Justus at the State Capitol Bldg, Room 328, Jefferson City Mo. 65101 ~ Telephone: 573-751-2788 ~ www.joliejustus.blogspot.com

Arkansas State Representative Lindsley Smith has introduced a bill to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment in Arkansas. You can contact Representative Smith at 340 No. Rollston Ave., Fayetteville AR ~ Telephone: 479-443-9706 ~ This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
 
More Articles...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next > End >>

Page 7 of 8

Reuters

The Onion

Joomla Templates by Joomlashack